Discover Our Collections


  • Series > Files of Charles E. Johnson (remove)
  • Tag > new2024-Mar (remove)

19 results

  • . IC) Cloaed In accordancewith restrictlonscontainedIn the donor'sdeed of gift. 3/20/2009 C1J ~ DEPARTMENT OF STATE DEPUTY UNDERSECRETARY ~ ~JC:';7, 1964 Dear Chuck: I am passing accordance this this on to you in with our telephone
  • . JOHNSON National Security Council Starr of the Committee or Principals Reference is made to our telephone conversation today on the background of the Comm1ttee or Principals. I believe the attached copy or a letter to Jimmy Lay and the accompanying draft
  • TELEPHONES IIIEPU ■ LIC 7-0200 IIIICPU ■ LIC 7-31129 December 17, MEMORANDUM FOR: McGeorge BWldy Special Assistant ,-OLVN COIIICOIIIAN 1964 VOUNOMAN to the President Dear Mac, Control Data Export License - French AEC With further reference
  • for National Security Affairs Rm 368 - EOB Chuck, This is the matter you today. Perhaps 1t: ,,,,,,.,, about which I telephoned we can chat about it upon your return. Howard C. Brown, Executive Assistant to the Chairman Enclosure: Cy of ltr dtd 12/26/62
  • ~ of these conversations which covered a variety of topics. Mr. GorhMl emphasized that Mr. Grey is a very forthright person who speaks bluntly and to the point. 2. Purpose The prima.ry purpose of the visit of Mr. Grey was to allow him to hold discussions with the GOI
  • P. oblem. But I cannot emphasize rongly enough that we are exam· not "indications. ' W. W. Rostow Ve MEMORANDUM FOR: Charles Johnson ch,u.d:_In accordance with our telephone conversation, I am attaching as you requested an excerpt of one item
  • . iEOMiil lo Jovemb r 2, 1965 Dear Hae, Control Aa to our telephone temporary proareas report (from tract fora puter thia. Data conversation onlyt yesterday, this i• a so .. how or other our contract.people 1ot inatructiona Co111Mrce?) to make
  • . 3, Approval Initial for Clearance Per Conversation As Requested Necessory Action Prepare Comment Note and Forward See Me Note and Return Signature For Your Information REMARKS OR ADDITIONAL Reply ROUTING .... FORM 2-u DS-10 r~7
  • governing the uses of celestial bodies. After some initial private conversations, and a letter from Gromyko to U Thant which indicated that" the USSR was interested in such a treaty, both the U.S. and the USSR tabled drafts. Ambassador Goldberg proposed
  • : F, ~. IOWA IDAHO vr. UTAH T, IIAMICY, IDCSCUTIVI: Dlllm:TOR May 9, 1962 / F / SEEREf Mr. Charles Eo Johnson National Security CounPil 368 Executive Offices Building Washington 25, Do C. Dear Mr. Johnson: In accordance with our conversation
  • with one of their own. Of course, they will have to persuade Shastri and other top Government officials this policy and expense is justified. I cannot predict Shastri's attitude. During our conversations they asked me what the attitude of the United States
  • ~GltiL·t 2. Tbore ia a aecond, more s:caneral undorat&nclin" with the Briti1h th:.t we will conault with them bf'fo:-e ·usin:; nuclc.ar weapons ~~ywbore, U possible. The b:Laic l:nlcr stanciini on thi• ?()ir.t is contained in a memorandum of conversation
  • ), of countries other considerations Force Nucleaire after, affecting Strategigue de Gaulle - Restricted The points conversations observers with French by General mostly with discussed Weapons Program: reactions a. likely on nuclear himself What
  • . In India's case, an additional factor would be India's view that, as a general matter, its own interests are served by any steps which seem to bring the U.S. and Soviet Union closer to­ gether and which, conversely, deepen the Sino-Soviet split. Further arms
  • knows how far the other can go along with it, and where the limit is beyond which it can advance no fur­ ther." All of which seemed to be Nas­ ser's way of saying that, in conversations with visiting Soviet Premier Aleksei Ko­ sygin, he had discovered